See-all Walkthrough, with Commentary: “The Gingerbread House” Chapter (Part 7b): Bucket Knight
Posted by PokerNemesis in Clues, MysteriesIn Part 7a, I proposed that Jennifer is the “Prince” in Bucket Knight’s clue, but might also be the “Princess” in the second sentence, whereas Wendy was the “Princess” in the rest of the clue.
This is undoubtedly more awkward than just giving all “Princess” references to Wendy. Can’t we do that instead?
Let’s look at the first two sentences of Bucket Knight’s clue again:
“…If memory serves me correctly, you coming here is the result of a trick played on you by your memories.
Or is it the mistake of a sad Princess who cannot come to terms with tragedy?“
What does it mean to say that Jennifer “coming here” is “the mistake” of Wendy. Relating this mistake to Wendy being unable to “come to terms with tragedy“? Can we come up with a good explanation?
One possible approach to explaining how Wendy might be considered responsible for Jennifer “coming here” is to treat Bucket Knight’s words as being analogous to what Wendy says to Jennifer in the “Stray Dog and the Lying Princess” chapter:
“Because you wouldn’t love me… because you were so stubborn… I brought you here.”
In my blog-post, The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery (Part 2), I proposed that Wendy, in the quote above, is explaining to Jennifer why Jennifer is dreaming about her forgotten past:
What Wendy said to Jennifer (”Because you wouldn’t love me… because you were so stubborn… I brought you here”) is not a memory re-emerging from Jennifer’s forgotten past. I don’t think that Wendy ever actually said that to Jennifer during the orphanage massacre. Rather, I think it is Jennifer’s dreaming mind, represented by Wendy (and also speaking on behalf of Jennifer’s blocked memory of Wendy), that is talking to Jennifer’s conscious mind in her dream, explaining the dream to her. Explaining to Jennifer why it is that she is having the dream.
Note that dream-Wendy, by this interpretation, is actually—at least in part—a personification of Jennifer’s own dreaming mind. So, if this interpretation also fits the Princess Wendy of the second sentence of Bucket Knight’s clue, it would seem that we might have come around full circle back to saying that the “Princess” is, as we proposed before, to some degree at least, actually Jennifer!
Do you guys have any other ideas as to how to interpret Bucket knight’s clue?
Tags: BucketKnight, Wendy

Entries (RSS)
A Sad Princess, by both of your interpretations, is in essance Jennifer.
Here’s a thought though. I remembered a time when it was considered that maybe Jennifer followed Gregory of her own free will after the airship crash and the first time she lost her memories.
“The mistake of a sad Princess who cannot come to terms with tragedy”
That or… There was also a time that we said Wendy may have knew Joshua before he died. If Wendy couldn’t come to terms with the tragedy of his death, that would not only explain why she latched on to Jen-as-Josh but also give an explination why Bucket Knight uses the word “Princess” here. Jen never calls herself princess and Wendy and the Orphans don’t call her princess.
As it stands, if Jennifer were the last one standing at the end of the day during the massacre, she would have then become, inherited, if you will, the princess title as she becomes the woeful princess at the end of the Little Princess story book. However, she’s not that far yet in her memories and we cannot yet see the end of the Little Princess story book. There is another princess with a line of girls behind her in wait for the title. Jennifer is hardly even a pauperin this point.
As Jennifer is referred to in this chapter most commonly as “Prince”, it stands to reason that in this chapter Wendy, the princess, is The Princess.
A princess who cannot come to terms with tragedy may in fact be a clue to what we were theorizing before however. Wendy not being able to come to terms with the loss of the first Prince. Her mistake is that she begins referring to and clinging to the idea of Jennifer as Joshua/her prince.
Just a thought I was having I’d put out there. I know it’s not all linear and is kind of abstract.
Those are all good and interesting thoughts, Masq.
But you see how ambiguous this Bucket Knight clue can seem…
Does “Princess” refer to Wendy or to Jennifer?
Does “Prince” refer to Jennifer or to Joshua?
Was “the cause of it all” the meeting of Jennifer and Wendy, or was it the meeting of Wendy and Joshua?
This isn’t an easy clue to interpret.
I understand that. Many of the would be important clues are that way.
PN, I was wondering if you were considering the myth I mentioned before in a previous thread about Orion. I think Orion may have been the character mold for Joshua, at least in an abstract sense, just as Diana and Diana/Artemis. They have differences, of course, but I was thinking…
If you look on Wikipedia, it says what I’ve said all along about mythology. There are many authors who believe many different things. However, the list of things that they give that Orion is connected with is kind of interesting…
Under “Orion”
Under “Oenopion”
Under “Cedalion”
So here we see that Orion has connection to Canis Major and Canis Minor, a big and small dog, Diana/Artemis, the Sky (to which he was risen), Chasing a Hare/Rabbit, a bull (a farm animal), and a Scorpian (an insect like in the onion bag), and being guided as one who is blind/incapable; also, depending on the story you read, Orion was said to be “tall enough” to wade through oceans, meaning he would be bigger than his peers. If you look at Wikipedia’s Orion article (under the mythology) you’ll also find him connected to a Nereid (sea nymph) called Opis, who was one of Diana’s huntresses.
I think it’s interesting that this one character has had so many similar incounters as Jennifer who was misnomered as Joshua, represented by a bear and who descended from the sky.l