How is it that a player of the Rule of Rose game is supposed to figure out that Jennifer needs to give the gun to Gregory in order to get the good ending?

Game-players wouldn’t normally think that they are supposed to intentionally arm a “boss” with a weapon in the midst of a boss-battle, rather than kill that “boss”.

And from the standpoint of the story itself, why would a young girl-child choose to give a loaded gun to a man who is acting crazy, who has just slaughtered all of her friends, and who has been spending the past few minutes trying very hard to murder her?

Why did the makers of Rule of Rose choose to design the game so that the way to get the good ending is to have Jennifer give the gun to Gregory (Stray Dog)?

I think that there are two clues in the game by which game-players (and Jennifer) are supposed to know to give the gun to Gregory. If you know of any others, please let me know in the comments.

One clue comes from Bucket Knight at the beginning of the chapter: “Do not be ruled by falsehood. That’s your only clue.”

Another clue came earlier in the game, in a newspaper article found in the Smoking Room of the airship:

20 December 1930

A tragic multiple homicide has occurred at an orphanage in Cardington resulting in the deaths of all the children housed there.
Among the dead was one adult, Gregory M. Wilson, a local resident.
Analysis of the crime scene suggests that Wilson shot himself with a pistol.
Police have identified him as their prime suspect in the murders of the children.
(Smoking Room, newspaper)

Jennifer killing Gregory in the boss-battle would contradict the newspaper article, which said that Gregory shot himself. This would amount to Jennifer violating Bucket Knight’s admonition, “Do not be ruled by falsehood.” Jennifer must accept her true memories of the past. She didn’t kill Gregory. Therefore the game-player, and Jennifer, must accept that and make it possible for Gregory to shoot himself. And this means giving him the gun.

But this is a motive for Jennifer to give Gregory the gun in Jennifer’s dream, it ISN’T, however, a motive for Jennifer to have given Gregory the gun during the actual massacre that occurred in her forgotten past. That would have been a rather crazy thing for Jennifer to have done, it seems to me.

Did Jennifer really give the gun to Gregory at the time of the actual massacre?

Tied into that question is another question: Did Wendy really give the gun to Jennifer at the time of the actual massacre?

Or was Jennifer “ruled by falsehood” throughout the Stray Dog boss-battle portion of her dream, dreaming a false version of events until the very end, when she allows Gregory to shoot himself, and she thereby chooses to accept her true memories of the past?

I will address these questions as I continue “The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery” series of posts.

Related posts:

The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery (Part 1)

The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery (Part 2)

Bad Ending vs. Good Ending

The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery (Part 4)

 

 

Tags: , , , ,
21 Responses to “The Stray Dog Boss-battle Mystery (Part 3)”
  1. CuriousAristocrat says:

    I was just going to ask about the statement “do not be ruled by falsehood” by the Bucket Knight when this blog-post came up…

    Thanks for the new post ^_^

  2. Maru says:

    As I posted in the other blog, I dont think the falsehood statement was indicating to the boss battle. However, yes, I do think that the news article links to handing over the gun. Plus, in the Gingerbread house chapter, when we walk in on Gregory in Joshua’s bedroom, hes seen pointing the gun to his head. It may have dawned on Jennifer that Gregory did, in fact, wanted to die…just not in front of her. When Wendy takes his gun, hes unable to end his own life, which I would assume would drive him mad with guilt and depression. After slaughtering several children, once hes presented with the gun, he realizes that he can finally end his life, and then does so.

  3. Stephen says:

    One way a player can know to give the gun to Gregory is that the gun has a “use” function in the menu, another is that Mr. G gets into position to allow this to happen. The whole idea that Jennifer`s ability to regain her memories is contingent upon a massacre that she did not cause ( directly ) is poor game construction IMO. I can easily imagine the brainstorming that the developers went through to come up with a reason why Jennifer should (want) regain her memories….kill her dog

  4. Jun says:

    Hmm i dunno if there is a topic on it.. (im still all the way to this point from the starting point) But where esactly WAS Jeniffer at the time of the Massacure. I feel like.. if i knew.. i could put together some issues to this Massacure.. Espeically when to know when he needed the gun to kill himself..

  5. PokerNemesis says:

    Jun asks,

    Hmm i dunno if there is a topic on it.. (im still all the way to this point from the starting point) But where esactly WAS Jeniffer at the time of the Massacure.

    There is no solid evidence to tell us, that I am aware of.
    However, I did make a conjecture about it in my blog-post:
    Did Jennifer Hide in the Grandfather Clock During the Massacre?
    ~

  6. Cain says:

    Just a little thought..maybe when battling the final boss *stray dog* she though that if given the gun to him he would have just killed himself…and even though every one is dead when she is battling him in a way its her way of resolving what had happened in the past

  7. ThisIsTheBestNameIGot says:

    Hey, I’ve been stalking these forums for a hot minute now, and mustered up the courage to actually say something.
    First of all, how I got here.
    I purchased RoR on a whim, attracted by the absurdist charm, but I wasn’t aware there was so much coverage of this intricate novel of a game. I’m not usually one for voice-over video game coverages as yours for RoR Mysteries; often voiced with grating over-emotive voices rambling about things even more grating than the voices themselves. However, I was so enthralled by your knowing commentary and equally knowing voice that I decided to check this blog/forum out. (I’m not usually one for blogs/forums either.)
    Secondly, a contribution (if you could even call it that, this sounds so stupid now that I look at it.)
    Awhile ago, a favorite cousin of mine showed me a game called chrono trigger or something. Realizing how much bad endings disappointed me and how little time I would have to play such a game before college, I insisted he show how to get the good ending. He showed me an attack sequence to be performed on the final boss that produced a melodic set of tones. He grimaced at handing me such a spoiler and insisted on showing me how one were to realize how to fulfill the conditions of this good ending. Upon listening to the main theme of the game, one can hear the tones of the attack sequence embedded various places in the song.
    I posit that a similar theory may hold with “A Love Suicide”.
    “Say, where is my shame/When I call your name”
    Gregory Wilson/Stray Dog insists on dubbing clearly differently gendered orphans with the name of his passed son in the vain attempt of replacing him, endangering one of them in this replacement process.
    “So please don’t set me free”
    Stray Dog may have been somewhat willing in his own “domestication” and enslavement since the instrument of his enslavement was Wendy’s semblance to his passed son.
    “I will do you harm/I will break my arm”
    The former line may refer to his violent tendencies and massacres, even towards the semblances of his son, as Stray Dog while the latter may bear implications about the self-inflicted (?) scarifications or, abiding with my half baked conspiracy theory, documented suicide after the aforementioned events.
    “I want to be dead/When I’m in bed”
    Although he himself is not bed, Gregory’s bedside tales and wierd pea-talk seem solemn, and one of the few father-son acts we see him perform without a stand in. This absence of a stand in presents more clearly the inevitability of his son’s death. He may either want to be dead from grief, or dead so he can actually read these stories with his deceased son.
    “I can be so mean/You can beat me”
    “Mean” would be a euphemism for Stray Dog’s crimes, and does allow himself to be dog-trained (beaten) by Wendy-as-Joshua.
    “I would like to blame/shame you/Just b/c my love…”
    Although a stand in for Joshua, Stray Dog is prodded to attempt J’s murder, and succeeds in murdering Wendy, another stand in, although he came to love at least J like his son while in the Gingerbread House. If it were not for his love for his son and his imitators, he would not have been so easily cohereced into the orphanage murders.
    “Alone but sane/A love suicide”
    I mean, he lives alone. He’s obviously not sane, but at least everythings okey dokey in his fabricated mental world alone in his house (spare the pistol to the head, possibly another clue to “use” the gun) until he encounters the outside world and things go awry with his stand ins. He even realizes something’s wrong at some level, though still half immersed in his delusions, prompting him to ask for the gun.
    There’s more connections than that, but I already slaved away enough on this nonsense.
    While I realize there are echoings of this song’s themes in many of the significant relationships (The masochist Meg with the sadist Diana, The masochist Amanda with the unwilling sadist Jennifer, Clara and Hoffman, need I say more?) I find the song rings especially true for me with Stray Dog. I know I’m crazy, but I felt guilty leeching off of all of your beautiful insights without contributing.

  8. PokerNemesis says:

    Welcome, ThisIsTheBestNameIGot!

    Your idea about “Love Suicide” being a song written to be sung as if from Gregory to Joshua is an idea that I don’t recall ever encountering before. It’s original and clever. And I suppose there is a precedent for that type of song (i.e. a father singing his love for his son) in the song, “Danny Boy”. And there is certainly logic in your analysis of the lyrics.

    Generally, I have assumed (as I think most others have) that “Love Suicide” is a song written to be sung as if from Wendy to Jennifer. As the singer of “Love Suicide” always sounded feminine to me (although admittedly the voice of a person much older than Wendy), this, and the fact that the song always seemed to me to be a variety of “torch song” which I associate more with female singers than male singers, and with romantic love rather than father-son love, has tended to lead me to think of Wendy singing to Jennifer. Also, the relationship between Wendy and Jennifer seems to me a bit more central to the story than the relationship between Gregory and Joshua, although certainly the Gregory-Joshua relationship could also be argued (but I think a little less convincingly) to have the central importance in the story.

  9. Grandpaf says:

    Oh, i am very happy to see someone posting this interpretation of Love Suicide! That was an idea i used in one of my french fanfiction some time ago. I also think this song could have his own thread!

    Orphelin, mais sensé
    Je suis l’Amour-Suicidé

    Car alors
    L’amour lui-même est aussi innocent qu’une rose en mai
    Doucereux et blanc, pur comme le péché

  10. ThisIsTheBestNameIGot says:

    Was there a french translation of this song (nice translation Grandpaf, mostly literal, but the hypenated amour-suicide and doucereux catch the English nuances nicely)? If so, “orphelin” blasts my already weak theory to smithereens!
    Undeniably, there are other more relevant readings of the song (How did I miss W-J?!?), but Stray Dog’s parental love caused the clearest, most literal suicides of all the loves in the work, unless I’m missing something (obviously a distinct possibility, I mean Wendy’s non-resistance suicide is a little hazier than, say, point blank bullet), thus the title. It works for almost all these relationships, but Stray Dog’s paternal obsession, although itself not a crux of the work, results in one of the most pivotal point of the work (although placed at the end.) The death of all the children allows them to be translocated eternally to the airship on which the majority of the work takes place according to some official site I saw in passing. Although the presence of Martha and Hoffman challenges this thereom, their adulthood may make them mavericks in this plot device, and they are both killed and reborn on the airship.
    Just like in chrono trigger, the theme song resonates literally (the instrumental gets some nice rotation I believe) in multiple important moments of the work, bearing manifold relevancies (is that a word?), but comes most directly into the service of the player, possibly, by hinting at the euthansia-suicide act to be facilitated by the gamer.
    Thanks you two for acknowledge my ramblings, I feel honored.
    Keep up the good work; these analyses awaken more in me than what I’m getting at college, too bad I have to go back this week, I wanna replay RoR for the full little princess storybook. Btw, could somebody post a report on the full little princess?
    Y’all rock!
    Oh yeah, I didn’t mean to imply a love song to Joshua. I meant a it was one of those love songs with a second reading (a la Sara Bareilles (sp?) or in the same vein, Ixesha by Lira). I perceived this song’s second meaning to be about the the relationship, not written for a character in it.
    Ramblings over.
    P.S. Thanks for the welcoming, a PN insert-your-psuedonym-here welcome was another reason I wrote this, nice souvenir for my thoughts.

  11. PokerNemesis says:

    For another blog-post dealing with the song “A Love Suicide”, see “A Love Suicide” and “All the Madmen” (Guest-post by Yuriko).
    ~

  12. Grandpaf says:

    ThisIsTheBestNameIGot, lets continue this discussion on the Love Suicide/ Madmen thread :)

  13. Sabo says:

    Did Gregory use the gun to kill some of the kids, and left one for himself? So he brought the gun with him when he went to the orphanage although we get no indication of any gunshots so we don’t know for sure

  14. PokerNemesis says:

    Welcome, Sabo!
    Wendy was the one in possession of the gun. She took it from Gregory’s house when she set Jennifer free.

  15. Distant_Prince says:

    I really needed to stop lurking around! XD Been two weeks! Anyways, I always thought that Jennifer never gave him the gun, nor did Wendy give Jennifer the gun. I’d always presummed that, since they were both there when they toke the gun, that they must have hidden it together and Jennifer would know where it was….and on her way out of the orphanage (after the 1st fight with stray dog, I think she was just hiding at that point T_T) took the gun but it fell out of her hand while dodging Gregory in the last fight…and then he took it and shot himself…

  16. PokerNemesis says:

    Welcome, Distant_Prince!

    I give my opinion, about how the gun may have appeared on the scene, in Part 4 of this series of blog-posts.

  17. SkyeDestiny says:

    Another clue to having to give the gun to Gregory is seen, I believe, in the “Gingerbread House” chapter, where, when you run into Gregory in his cellar bedroom, he’s seen with his back towards the door, holding a gun to his head. He only lowers the gun, and it seems to even disappear, when he notices Jennifer.

    Also, I think you’re right about Jennifer never giving the gun to Gregory in reality, and never even receiving the gun from Wendy. I think that was, as you mentioned in a past entry, a wish-fulfillment portion of the dream. What I believe really happened is that Jennifer hid during the time of the massacre. But, as we’ve seen, it appears she wishes to view herself as…more courageous, I guess, than she really is. (Though she can’t be blamed for being so fearful – she was just a child after all.) Rather, I think what the whole boss battle is is Jennifer’s way of saying, “This is what I -should’ve- done.” Or, “I really wish this had happened instead…”

  18. PokerNemesis says:

    SkyeDestiny wrote:

    Rather, I think what the whole boss battle is is Jennifer’s way of saying, “This is what I -should’ve- done.” Or, “I really wish this had happened instead…”

    Yes, and while she’s imagining this more appealing (to herself) way that her past had played out, she even throws in having Brown alive and fighting at her side.

  19. Nasta says:

    viewing the post i noticed something disconcerting
    In the newspaper says thats ALL the childrens was murdered…
    including jennifer??

  20. PokerNemesis says:

    Welcome, Nasta!

    Players are supposed to find that newspaper as early as the “Sir Peter” chapter, and are supposed to be disconcerted about it throughout the rest of the game until the massacre is over. Unfortunately, many players don’t search for documents thoroughly as they play the first time through and so miss out on this extra dollop of dread.

    Jennifer explains the discrepancy between that newspaper article, and her survival, in the last chapter if you click on the orphanage name plate on the outside gate:

    The Rose Garden Orphanage… That day, I was escorted from the scene by Officer Doolittle. At first, it was reported that there were no survivors… Then, word got out that, miraculously, I had escaped the tragedy… When rumor spread that I was also the sole survivor of a horrific airship accident in which the passengers were all presumed to be dead, the media went into a frenzy. and so, the tragic murder of the residents of a rural orphanage was instantly bumped from the front cover of the daily newspaper to an obscure corner… I’m sorry everyone. You don’t deserve to be forgotten… But I’ll remember you. Thank you all for the precious memories.

  21. Nasta says:

    ooooohhh thats explain it.
    Viewing the post bring me diseres to play the game again jeje

  22.  
Leave a Reply


Powered by Laughing Squid